<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TYPESETT &#187; Best &amp; Worst</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.typesett.com/category/best-worst/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.typesett.com</link>
	<description>Your AMUSING Resource for Useful Design, Typography and Web Dev Articles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 07:53:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Best &amp; Worst Television Network Websites</title>
		<link>http://www.typesett.com/2009/05/best-worst-television-network-websites/</link>
		<comments>http://www.typesett.com/2009/05/best-worst-television-network-websites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 06:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Best & Worst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best of Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.typesett.com/?p=798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Television is still one of the most powerful media outlets today despite the increasing popularity of the Internet.</strong> How do the networks represent themselves online? At the best, ESPN and CNN represent the best destination for their type of specialty for both television and the web... and at the worst, MTV and BET are leaders in youth culture yet are not very provocative in their websites. <strong>Here are 20 very popular network websites that I categorized into <em>Best</em>, <em>Average</em> and <em>Worst</em>:</strong>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Television is still one of the most powerful media outlets today despite the increasing popularity of the Internet.</strong> How do the networks represent themselves online? At the best, ESPN and CNN represent the best destination for their type of specialty for both television and the web&#8230; and at the worst, MTV and BET are leaders in youth culture yet are not very provocative in their websites. <strong>Here are 20 very popular network websites that I categorized into <em>Best</em>, <em>Average</em> and <em>Worst</em>:</strong></p>
<h5>BEST</h5>
<p>The one common factor of all these websites is that they should make you excited about the programming for that network. As usual, the more innovative, usable and aesthetically pleasing along the way the better. <strong>I think these are the best:</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.fxnetworks.com/"><strong>FX Network</strong></a><br />
<img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/1-fx.jpg" alt="FX Network" /><br />
FX has a unique layout while clearly highlighting their unique programming.<br />
<span id="more-798"></span><br />
<a href="http://espn.go.com/"><strong>ESPN</strong></a><br />
<img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/2-espn.jpg" alt="ESPN" /><br />
ESPN is one of the rare cases of being equally dominant on air and on the tubes. Their recent redesign keeps them on top.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fox.com/"><strong>FOX</strong></a><br />
<img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/3-fox.jpg" alt="FOX" /><br />
Say what you want about them but their website is clean, sticks out from the other big 5 networks and highlights their shows well.</p>
<p><a href="http://dsc.discovery.com/"><strong>Discovery Network</strong></a><br />
<img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/4-discovery.jpg" alt="Discovery" /><br />
They manage to make educational programming look&#8230; sexy. At least better than PBS.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tnt.tv/"><strong>TNT</strong></a><br />
<img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/5-tnt.jpg" alt="TNT" /><br />
Easy to digest and I love the transitions on the sliding hero graphic. They took a tried and true user pattern and made it work well for them.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.foodnetwork.com/"><strong>Food Network</strong></a><br />
<img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/6-food-network.jpg" alt="Food Network" /><br />
Similar to ESPN they are big players in the culinary resources available online.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cbs.com/"><strong>CBS</strong></a><br />
<img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/7-cbs.jpg" alt="CBS" /><br />
When a channel goes out to promote a popular show&#8230; might as well go all in. I don&#8217;t even watch Survivor but I wanted to after visiting,</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bravotv.com/"><strong>Bravo</strong></a><br />
<img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/8-bravo.jpg" alt="Bravo" /><br />
Bravo did a good job of developing a simple, yet unique look. It went a long way in helping their content look fresh to their target demographics. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/"><strong>CNN</strong></a><br />
<img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/9-cnn.jpg" alt="CNN" /><br />
CNN is one of the cornerstone news websites on the web.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cinemax.com/"><strong>Cinemax</strong></a><br />
<img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/10-cinemax.jpg" alt="Cinemax" /><br />
Cinemax opted to do a fresh layout with interesting typography choices while highlighting popular features — like highlighting current programming on the homepage.</p>
<h5>AVERAGE</h5>
<p>These networks offer compelling content yet their websites present the programming in a generic way. I&#8217;m not very excited by what I see on the homepage and the actual website features are not very compelling considering the content.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pbs.org/"><strong>PBS</strong></a><br />
<img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/11-pbs.jpg" alt="PBS" /><br />
A network with so much history and who us so beloved by their viewers has a very unassuming website. Granted, their demographic may skew mature but I think this is a competent if not generic design.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nbc.com/"><strong>NBC</strong></a><br />
<img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/12-nbc.jpg" alt="NBC" /><br />
I don&#8217;t understand the organic swirl background and what the heck it has to do with NBC. This reminds me of a late 1990s portal search engine website.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hbo.com/"><strong>HBO</strong></a><br />
<img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/13-hbo.jpg" alt="HBO" /><br />
This is the BMW of TV networks. All I see is text text text. They couldn&#8217;t find a way to bring some of the glitz, glam, guns, sin and sex people love about HBO into the home? </p>
<p><a href="http://www.travelchannel.com/"><strong>Travel Channel</strong></a><br />
<img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/14-travel-channel.jpg" alt="Travel Channel" /><br />
Travel Channel. Not as popular as the rest of the TV channels but they have a built in excuse and unique programming subject matter to go nuts but they don&#8217;t. Let the genie out of the bottle!</p>
<h5>WORST</h5>
<p>What stuck out the most to me as being &#8220;worst&#8221; is that channels who have distinct content that can naturally translate to the web don&#8217;t stand out.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.vh1.com/"><strong>VH1</strong></a><br />
<img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/15-vh1.jpg" alt="VH1" /><br />
VH1 manages to be loud but quiet, bold yet shy&#8230; the design could stand to be &#8220;chunked out&#8221; a little to help visually distinguish sections from each other. All I see is text, text, girl, girl, pink, pink and it feels very chaotic.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mtv.com/"><strong>MTV</strong></a><br />
<img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/16-mtv.jpg" alt="MTV" /><br />
Their contribution to the internet is a huge form field and a Javascript randomizer for their style sheets?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bet.com/"><strong>BET</strong></a><br />
<img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/17-bet.jpg" alt="BET" /><br />
It feels like they&#8217;re trying to fill up space. Regardless, very uninspired for a TV network with their cache in youth culture.</p>
<p><a href="http://abc.go.com/"><strong>ABC</strong></a><br />
<img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/18-abc.jpg" alt="ABC" /><br />
This is the best ABC can come up with? I logged on to your website to watch commercials, get a clue. Those little thumbnails and middling hero graphic are very uninspiring compared to what FX does. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.nick.com/"><strong>NICK</strong></a><br />
<img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/19-nick.jpg" alt="NICK" /><br />
Another website that can use some &#8220;chunking&#8221;. It feels like content soup which may not be a great idea considering the demographic for some of the content.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tbs.com/"><strong>TBS</strong></a><br />
<img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/20-tbs.jpg" alt="TBS" /><br />
Going along with their tagline — &#8220;very funny&#8221;, it looks like a very happy website but the lack of contrast is very glaring. If they had just a bit more white on this website (especially as a background for text) they could be in the &#8220;best&#8221; category.</p>
<h5>Articles you may also like:</h5>
<p><a href="http://www.typesett.com/2009/03/en-fuego-best-worst-nba-websites/">En Fuego! Best &#038; Worst NBA Websites </a><br />
<a href="http://www.typesett.com/2009/03/10-shockingly-beautiful-us-government-websites/">10 Shockingly Beautiful US Government Websites!</a><br />
<a href="http://www.typesett.com/2009/04/comparing-websites-of-rival-companies/">Comparing Websites of Rival Companies</a></p>
<h5>Agree? Disagree? Let me hear it in the comments?</h5>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.typesett.com/2009/05/best-worst-television-network-websites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>En Fuego! Best &amp; Worst NBA Websites</title>
		<link>http://www.typesett.com/2009/03/en-fuego-best-worst-nba-websites/</link>
		<comments>http://www.typesett.com/2009/03/en-fuego-best-worst-nba-websites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 05:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Best & Worst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.typesett.com/?p=328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>NBA teams have a license to ill</strong> when it comes to their websites because they want to keep you excited, informed and motivated to go see the games either in person or on TV. However, only some are <strong><em>En Fuego</em></strong>, most are either a satisfactory <strong><em>Aight</em></strong> or worse of all complete <strong><em>Scrubs</em></strong>. The Miami Heat website is the worse of all. <strong><em>It looks like they hired one of their cheerleaders to moonlight on it or something.</em></strong>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>NBA teams have a license to ill</strong> when it comes to their websites because they want to keep you excited, informed and motivated to go see the games either in person or on TV. However, only some are <strong><em>En Fuego</em></strong>, most are either a satisfactory <strong><em>Aight</em></strong> or worse of all complete <strong><em>Scrubs</em></strong>. The Miami Heat website is the worse of all. <strong><em>I suspect they hired one of their cheerleaders to moonlight on it.</em></strong></p>
<h5>En Fuego</h5>
<p>These teams have the <strong>best blend of creativity, visual excitement and uniqueness</strong> that make them stand above the rest. The NY Knicks for example just give off a &#8220;Heart of NY&#8221; feel to it that I think all the other cities should try to capture.</p>
<p><strong>The New York Knicks</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.nba.com/knicks/"><img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/knicks.jpg" alt="Knicks Website Screen Shot" /></a><br />
<span id="more-328"></span><br />
<strong>Charlotte Bobcats</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.nba.com/bobcats/"><img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/bobcats.jpg" alt="Bobcats Website Screen Shot" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Memphis Grizzlies</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.nba.com/grizzlies/"><img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/grizzlies.jpg" alt="Grizzlies Website Screen Shot" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Oklahoma Thunder</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.nba.com/thunder/"><img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/thunder.jpg" alt="Thunder Website Screen Shot" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Portland Trailblazers</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.nba.com/trailblazers/"><img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/blazers.jpg" alt="Blazers Website Screen Shot" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nba.com/raptors/"><img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/raptors.jpg" alt="Raptors Website Screen Shot" /></a></p>
<h5>Aight</h5>
<p>These are competent but have a run-of-the-mill flavor to them. <strong>They don&#8217;t do anything conceptually unique to their city or team very well.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Chicago Bulls</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.nba.com/bulls/"><img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/bulls.jpg" alt="Bulls Website Screen Shot" /></a></p>
<p><strong>New Jersey Nets</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.nba.com/nets/"><img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/nets.jpg" alt="Nets Website Screen Shot" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Detroit Pistons</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.nba.com/pistons/"><img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/pistons.jpg" alt="Pistons Website Screen Shot" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Los Angeles Clippers</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.nba.com/clippers/"><img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/clippers.jpg" alt="Clippers Website Screen Shot" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Cleveland Cavaliers</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.nba.com/cavaliers/"><img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/cavs.jpg" alt="Cavs Website Screen Shot" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Denver Nuggets</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.nba.com/nuggets/"><img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/nuggets.jpg" alt="Nuggets Website Screen Shot" /></a></p>
<p><strong>San Antonio Spurs</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.nba.com/spurs/"><img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/spurs.jpg" alt="Spurs Website Screen Shot" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Phoenix Suns</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.nba.com/suns/"><img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/suns.jpg" alt="Suns Website Screen Shot" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Atlanta Hawks</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.nba.com/hawks/"><img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/hawks.jpg" alt="Hawks Website Screen Shot" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Indiana Pacers</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.nba.com/pacers/"><img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/pacers.jpg" alt="Pacers Website Screen Shot" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Washington Wizards</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.nba.com/wizards/"><img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/wizards.jpg" alt="Wizards Website Screen Shot" /></a></p>
<h5>Scrubs</h5>
<p><strong>Just looking for when the next game is can give you epileptic seizures</strong> they&#8217;re so blatantly loud and flashy. Some are so bad that you can&#8217;t even tell what team it is because they don&#8217;t feature their logo in a prominent place. </p>
<p><strong>Philadelphia 76ers</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.nba.com/sixers/"><img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/76ers.jpg" alt="76ers Website Screen Shot" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Miami Heat</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.nba.com/heat/"><img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/heat.jpg" alt="Heat Website Screen Shot" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Sacramento Kings</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.nba.com/kings/"><img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/kings.jpg" alt="Kings Website Screen Shot" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Dallas Mavericks</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.nba.com/mavericks/"><img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/mavs.jpg" alt="Mavs Website Screen Shot" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Minnesota Timberwolves</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.nba.com/timberwolves/"><img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/wolves.jpg" alt="Timberwolves Website Screen Shot" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Milwaukee Bucks</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.nba.com/bucks/"><img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/bucks.jpg" alt="Bucks Website Screen Shot" /></a></p>
<p><strong>New Orleans Hornets</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.nba.com/hornets/"><img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/hornets.jpg" alt="Hornets Website Screen Shot" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Los Angeles Lakers</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.nba.com/lakers/"><img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/lakers.jpg" alt="Lakers Website Screen Shot" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Houston Rockets</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.nba.com/rockets/"><img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/rockets.jpg" alt="Rockets Website Screen Shot" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Boston Celtics</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.nba.com/celtics/"><img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/celtics.jpg" alt="Celtics Website Screen Shot" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Utah Jazz</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.nba.com/jazz/"><img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/jazz.jpg" alt="Jazz Website Screen Shot" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Orlando Magic</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.nba.com/magic/"><img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/magic.jpg" alt="Magic Website Screen Shot" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Golden State Warriors</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.nba.com/warriors/"><img src="http://www.typesett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/warriors.jpg" alt="Warriors Website Screen Shot" /></a></p>
<h5>Did I diss your team? Let me know where I can go shove it in the comments!</h5>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.typesett.com/2009/03/en-fuego-best-worst-nba-websites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
